![]() ![]() ![]() The other upside of a proper desktop PC, is the cooling. To get the best of all worlds, and save £££ at the same time. You can combine a fast NVME drive with additional internal storage, and a colour-accurate monitor. But the big one for photography is the additional storage you can have! It’s really easy to get a PC built that ticks all the boxes and costs way less then the equivalent Apple. And you can then use slower drives for storage. The idea being that your operating system and the software you’re using along with images you’re currently editing goes on the faster drive. I’d recommend an m.2 NVME SSD, these are 6 x faster than a normal SSD. RAM is much of a muchness, you want a minimum of 16GB and I’d highly recommend 32GBĪnd ideally, your main drive wants to be as fast as you can get it. So the CPUs run slower than they would in a full size desktop, simply because a full size desktop can move air around better. ![]() This is because of the lack of good heat management. The most important things for editing are:Īny all-in-one solution, regardless of whether it’s Apple or Windows, laptop or iMac, suffers on the first. In fact, you’re more than likely getting a lot less. Which is fine! But don’t think you’re getting any more bang for your buck. Now that’s not to say you *shouldn’t* choose a Mac, you might be tied into their OS, or just really love using it. There is no performance advantage at all, just less flexibility on specifications. But since the move to intel architecture, the internals of an iMac are exactly the same as a PC. So there’s a lot of debate on the internet about what the best computer is for editing, with many preferring Apple, supposedly for it’s superior editing capabilities. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |